UTD24 Research Publishing
Enterprise, Policy and Economic Dynamics

Seeing Is Not Deciding - Can Multimodal LLMs Act as Effective CEOs? arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.05864: Failure Modes and Error Containment

Read & download PDF
Abstract

Aggregate performance can conceal concentrated failures, so errors must be classified by cause, consequence, and the controls available to contain them. This structured evidence review evaluates "Seeing Is Not Deciding: Can Multimodal LLMs Act as Effective CEOs? arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.05864" alongside nine author-disjoint, topically matched publications in multimodal decision support. It compares construct definitions, evaluation choices, operating assumptions, and reported limitations instead of treating bibliographic similarity as empirical equivalence. Viewed through error taxonomy and failure containment, the map separates claims supported by the available record from questions that still require full-text extraction, replication, or new experiments. The synthesis is interpretive rather than meta-analytic and therefore does not present a pooled effect estimate or a new causal result. The resulting agenda pairs a documented error taxonomy with stress tests, escalation rules, and safeguards for high-consequence failures.

Keywords
multimodal decision supporterror taxonomy and failure containmentevidence synthesisreproducibilityresearch evaluation
References
  1. Dai, Y., Peng, X., Wang, Y., Nakov, P., & Xie, Z. (2026). Seeing Is Not Deciding: Can Multimodal LLMs Act as Effective CEOs? arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.05864. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.05864 DOI
  2. HIRAGAR, P.-R. (2025). Med-AgentX: Multimodal Large Language Model Agents with Explainable Reinforcement Learning for Trustworthy Biomedical Decision Support. . https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7773686/v1 DOI
  3. Wang, T., Zhang, B., Jiang, D., & Li, D. (2025). A Multimodal Large Language Model Framework for Intelligent Perception and Decision-Making in Smart Manufacturing. Sensors, 25(10), 3072. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103072 DOI
  4. Jiang, Y., Li, Z., & Philip Chen, C.-L. (2024). Research on Financial Big Data Collection and Intelligent Decision-Making System Based on Multimodal Large Language Model. 2024 International Conference on Fuzzy Theory and Its Applications (iFUZZY), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ifuzzy63051.2024.10662884 DOI
  5. CHEN, Y., Lyu, G., Zhang, J., & Liu, P. (2025). RECOGNITION AND CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING OF LIVER ULTRASOUND STANDARD PLANES BASED ON MULTIMODAL LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 51, S108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.11.106 DOI
  6. Yang, L., Li, Y., Tan, J., & Mao, L. (2025). Research on risk decision-making generation method for water conservancy project based on multimodal knowledge graph and large language model. PLOS One, 20(8), e0330258. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330258 DOI
  7. GORSE, V., Mitteau, R., & Marot, J. (2025). Decision Support for In-Operation Monitoring of the West Tokamak First Wall Using Multimodal Large Language Model (Llm) on Infrared Imaging. . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5177592 DOI
  8. Liao, T., Fang, X., Feng, Y., & Wang, S. (2026). Reliable and Efficient Decision-Making for Large Language Model Agents through Uncertainty-Guided Adaptive Reasoning. . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6844659 DOI
  9. Gómez, C., Yin, J., Huang, C.-M., & Unberath, M. (2024). How Large Language Model-Powered Conversational Agents Influence Decision Making in Domestic Medical Triage Contexts. . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4797707 DOI
  10. Huang, H.-L., Liu, C., Roozbahani, M.-M., & Frost, J.-D. (2026). SeismoMind: A Zero-shot Decision-Tree Based Multimodal Large Language Model Framework for Post-Earthquake Infrastructure Damage Understanding. . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6466459 DOI
Publication details
Journal
Enterprise, Policy and Economic Dynamics
Volume
1 (2026)
Article number
eped20260074
License
CC BY 4.0