Handling Missing Data in CALL - A Data Quality-Driven Imputation Framework for Learner Analytics: Failure Modes and Error Containment

Authors

  • Alec Armstrong Author
  • Brett Davidson Author
  • Bryce Holland Author

Keywords:

data quality in learner analytics, error taxonomy and failure containment, evidence synthesis, reproducibility, research evaluation

Abstract

Aggregate performance can conceal concentrated failures, so errors must be classified by cause, consequence, and the controls available to contain them. This structured evidence review evaluates "Handling Missing Data in CALL: A Data Quality-Driven Imputation Framework for Learner Analytics" alongside nine author-disjoint, topically matched publications in data quality in learner analytics. It compares construct definitions, evaluation choices, operating assumptions, and reported limitations instead of treating bibliographic similarity as empirical equivalence. Viewed through error taxonomy and failure containment, the map separates claims supported by the available record from questions that still require full-text extraction, replication, or new experiments. The synthesis is interpretive rather than meta-analytic and therefore does not present a pooled effect estimate or a new causal result. The resulting agenda pairs a documented error taxonomy with stress tests, escalation rules, and safeguards for high-consequence failures.

References

  1. Cao, X., Tao, J., Liu, Z., Lyu, R., & Li, J. (2026). Handling Missing Data in CALL: A Data Quality-Driven Imputation Framework for Learner Analytics. Future-Adaptive Intelligence and Lifelong Systems, 1(1).
  2. EL MOUDDEN, T., & Lachgar, N. (2026). When Missing Data Matters: Imputation, TOPSIS, and the Misrepresentation of Morocco’s Education System. . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6643909
  3. KALKAN, Ö.-K., KARA, Y., & KELECİOĞLU, H. (2018). Evaluating Performance of Missing Data Imputation Methods in IRT Analyses. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(3), 403-416. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.430720
  4. Anand, V., & Mamidi, V. (2020). Multiple Imputation of Missing Data in Marketing. 2020 International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry: Way Towards a Sustainable Economy (ICDABI), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdabi51230.2020.9325602
  5. Xu, L., & Qiu, A. (2022). Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations for Missing Data in UK Biobank. 2022 6th Annual International Conference on Data Science and Business Analytics (ICDSBA), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdsba57203.2022.00026
  6. Yang, L., & Chiang, J.-A. (2020). Use Case and Performance Analyses for Missing Data Imputation Methods in Big Data Analytics. Proceedings of 2020 6th International Conference on Computing and Data Engineering, 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379247.3379270
  7. Wang, K., Luo, M., Deng, M., & Chen, H. (2022). Nested Random Forest: A Personalized Imputation Method for Missing Data. 2022 8th International Conference on Big Data and Information Analytics (BigDIA), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdia56350.2022.9874127
  8. Sebastian, A.-M., Peter, D., & Sebastian, R.-A. (2025). An optimal imputation algorithm for reducing bias and errors in missing data handling for AI models. Decision Analytics Journal, 16, 100627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100627
  9. He, Y., Zhang, G., & Hsu, C.-H. (2021). Multiple Imputation Analysis for Nonignorable Missing Data. Multiple Imputation of Missing Data in Practice, 375-406. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429156397-13
  10. Sivakani, R., Rahila, J., Sudha, P., Priscila, S.-S., Shynu, T., Minu, M.-S., & Pradeep, V. (2025). A Smart Review on Imputation Techniques for Handling Missing Data. Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics, and Optimization in Complex Systems, 41-62. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-5203-9.ch003

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

Issue

Section

Review Article