Seeing Is Not Deciding - Can Multimodal LLMs Act as Effective CEOs? arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.05864: From Benchmark Results to External Validity

Abstract

Benchmark performance is useful only when the evaluation setting represents the populations and operating conditions to which the result will be transferred. This structured evidence review evaluates "Seeing Is Not Deciding: Can Multimodal LLMs Act as Effective CEOs? arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.05864" alongside nine author-disjoint, topically matched publications in multimodal decision support. It compares construct definitions, evaluation choices, operating assumptions, and reported limitations instead of treating bibliographic similarity as empirical equivalence. Viewed through benchmark transfer and external validity, the map separates claims supported by the available record from questions that still require full-text extraction, replication, or new experiments. The synthesis is interpretive rather than meta-analytic and therefore does not present a pooled effect estimate or a new causal result. The resulting agenda prioritizes cross-site replication, explicit eligibility criteria, and reporting of performance across materially different settings.